Insights
& Commentary

Insights list

SCC: Limited Statutory Rights of Appeal Do Not Preclude Judicial Review for Unaddressed Questions - photo
  • Commentaries

SCC: Limited Statutory Rights of Appeal Do Not Preclude Judicial Review for Unaddressed Questions

By: Michael A. Valdez Introduction The Supreme Court of Canada in Yatar v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex[1] confirmed the courts have discretion to review administrative decisions. Insurers appearing before such administrative bodies and seeking to rely on administrative decisions ought to take note of this decision as it means that decisions of administrative bodies, such … Continued

Court of Appeal Rejects All Sums Approach to Long-Tail Claims - photo
  • Commentaries

Court of Appeal Rejects All Sums Approach to Long-Tail Claims

Overview and Executive Summary So-called “long-tail claims”, i.e. claims where the alleged damage spans a number of years, pose various coverage challenges for insurers and policyholders. On February 27, 2024, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Loblaw Companies Limited v. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Canada, 2024 ONCA 145 (CanLII) … Continued

by

The Courts clarify a condominium corporation’s obligations when a unit owner complains about noise from another unit owner - photo
  • Commentaries

The Courts clarify a condominium corporation’s obligations when a unit owner complains about noise from another unit owner

In August 2022, Justice Morgan, of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, held that a unit owner had not been oppressed notwithstanding he was dissatisfied with steps taken by the condominium board to address his noise complaints. In January 2024, the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed the unit owner’s appeal, upholding Justice Morgan’s decision.[1] This … Continued

by

Finding the Line for Occupier’s Liability: Responsibility of Occupiers for Natural Hazards on their Premises - photo
  • Commentaries

Finding the Line for Occupier’s Liability: Responsibility of Occupiers for Natural Hazards on their Premises

A Recent Decision by the Ontario Court of Appeal Provides Guidance on the Responsibility of Occupiers for Natural Hazards on their Premises By: Thomas Russell A recent decision by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Lyng v. Ontario Place Corporation, 2024 provides useful guidance on the responsibility of occupiers for natural hazards on their premises.[1] … Continued

by

ONCA Clarifies Coverage Chaos: G1 Driver Given Consent to use Father’s Vehicle on Highway they Mistakenly Believe to be Roadway, Injures Passenger on Completely Different Highway on Which he had No Permission to Travel - photo
  • Commentaries

ONCA Clarifies Coverage Chaos: G1 Driver Given Consent to use Father’s Vehicle on Highway they Mistakenly Believe to be Roadway, Injures Passenger on Completely Different Highway on Which he had No Permission to Travel

By Michael A. Valdez “This world’s a city full of straying streets” (and in this case, highways) -William Shakespeare and John Fletcher, The Two Noble Kinsmen Introduction In the 2023 Decision of Pridmore v. Drenth,[1] the Ontario Court of Appeal illuminates the complex issue of whether the mistaken belief that a highway is a road … Continued