By: Kurt K. Pereira and Avi Sharabi[1] Overview On August 27, 2024, the Ontario Court of Appeal rendered its decision in Live Nation Ontario Concerts GP, Inc. v. Aviva Insurance Company of Canada, 2024 ONCA 634 (CanLII) (“Live Nation v. Aviva”). Live Nation v. Aviva arose out of a request for defence coverage by an … Continued
Insights
& Commentary
Insights list
Stolove v. Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care: Recent Developments in Systemic Negligence in Class Actions
By Christian Breukelman and Bridget Irish On June 25, 2024, Justice Perell released his decision on a certification motion in Stolove v. Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, 2024 ONSC 3639. This decision has significant takeaways for the growing number of potential class actions rooted in ‘systemic negligence.’ Stieber Berlach LLP represented Waypoint Centre for … Continued
by Christian Breukelman
Imperfect Compliance: A No Harm, No Foul Approach to the Proof of Loss Requirement under the Insurance Act.
By: Kayla Sager The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Stewart v. Bay of Quinte Mutual Insurance Co., 2024 ONCA 730 (“Stewart v. Bay of Quinte”), offers insights into the responsibilities of insurers, particularly in assessing the value of lost property, and managing risk. Stewart v. Bay of Quinte arose out of a dispute … Continued
No Reporting, No Relief Under Claims Made and Reported Policies
By Zachary Sherman In Kestenberg Siegal Lipkus LLP v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Co of Canada, the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed that relief from forfeiture is unavailable to insureds who fail to report a claim to their insurer under a “claims made and reported” policy. The decision also affirms that the language requiring … Continued
Does a self-insured retention (“SIR”) affect a request for defence by an additional insured?
By: Kurt K. Pereira and Avi Sharabi[1] Overview On August 27, 2024, the Ontario Court of Appeal rendered its decision in Live Nation Ontario Concerts GP, Inc. v. Aviva Insurance Company of Canada, 2024 ONCA 634 (CanLII) (“Live Nation v. Aviva”). Live Nation v. Aviva arose out of a request for defence coverage by an … Continued
by Kurt K. Pereira Avi Sharabi
SCC Split Rules Owners Liable as Employers under the Occupational Health and Safety Act
By Felisia Milana Introduction Municipalities are being kept on their toes with the recent Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) decision in R v Greater Sudbury (City).[1] The SCC held that owners of a construction project fall within the definition of an “employer” under the Occupation Health and Safety Act (“OHSA”)[2] and are subject to the … Continued
Honesty is the Best Policy: Court of Appeal Emphasizes Insured Parties’ Responsibility for Full Disclosure
By: Dimitris Logothetis Introduction and Background It is a trite law of human nature that honesty is the best policy. And it is trite law, as in the actual law, that this is especially true for parties entering insurance agreements. In Davies v. AIG Insurance Company of Canada, 2024 ONCA 509,[1] the Ontario Court of … Continued
The Court of Appeal Reaffirms the Importance of a Physician’s Duty to Obtain Informed Consent
By: Caroline Swiderski Denman v. Radovanovic 2024 ONCA 276 Introduction It is expected that prior to any elective treatment, a physician owes a duty to the patient to provide adequate disclosure of risks.[1] This duty has been expanded over the years to include all advising doctors, even if they are not involved in the treatment … Continued
The Ontario Court of Appeal Provides Important Guidance on Evidence Involving Novel Science, Collateral Facts, and Statutory Benefits
By: Thomas Russell A Review of the Recent Ontario Court of Appeal Decision in Kolapully v. Myles, 2024 Background In March of 2012, Shoba Kolapully was struck by a Toronto Transit Commission (“TTC”) bus, driven by Lynda Myles.[1] Kolapully commenced an action against Myles and the TTC for general and specific damages in 2013, … Continued
by Thomas Russell